Expensive one, this.
Thats nice, I like the external colourExpensive one, this.
ETTO but they should be red.Thats nice, I like the external colour![]()
It's a Parker, so will be built well but is very expensive (dealer mark up and some). No mention of what mileage the car has done (it's a 2.8) other than the 6,000 since build.Looks nice
Aye but when you can't find out which bl00dy red it should be it's irrelevantETTO but they should be red.![]()


In 2016 it had done 130K.It's a Parker, so will be built well but is very expensive (dealer mark up and some). No mention of what mileage the car has done (it's a 2.8) other than the 6,000 since build.
So it has nearly 140k miles under its belt? That, and being registered as a Z3 still, makes it extremely expensive IMO.In 2016 it had done 130K.
There is that, yes!Aye but when you can't find out which bl00dy red it should be it's irrelevant![]()
Curious about how you can tell? Is it because of the camber of the rear wheels?Looks like the rear beam bushed are fooked.![]()
Well something isn't rightCurious about how you can tell? Is it because of the camber of the rear wheels?

.I totally agree. For the sake of a few thousand (difference between a really good Z3 and a nail) I really don't see the logic.I really don’t see the logic behind using a high mileage car for a replica that could be worth a lot if done well. It’s only a few grand between a really mint low mileage Z3 and a basket case.
But that costs nearly as much as just finding a better car to begin with.I suppose if they've replaced all the wear-and-tear parts, bushes, bearings etc and stripped and rebuilt the engine and transmission etc etc then the milage doeasn't matter so much.